With the advent of new laws on October 3, 2023, allowing for the public identification of individuals charged with offenses such as rape, sexual assault, attempted rape, and assault with intent to commit rape prior to trial, a significant paradigm shift in legal protocols has arisen.
The amendments to the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act of 1978, as elucidated by Minister Yvette D’Ath, the Minister for Justice and Prevention of Domestic and Family Violence, are aimed at reshaping societal attitudes towards cases of sexual offenses. The Palaszczuk government’s commitment to fortifying the justice system, holding offenders accountable, and enhancing transparency in sentencing decisions aligns with community expectations. The overarching goal of the changes to Queensland laws is to ensure fairness uniformly across all states and territories in Australia, with the exception of the Northern Territory, where accused individuals can now be identified prior to the trial commencing.
Nevertheless, this legal framework includes a solitary exception; the accused may not be publicly identified if such identification would reveal the accuser’s identity. Consequently, an influx of Non-Publication Order (NPO) applications has been observed, seeking to shield the identities of the accused from media exposure.
Recent events in Toowoomba exemplify this trend, wherein an application was made to the Supreme Court seeking to suppress the accused’s identity until the matter is fully heard. This injunction, granted five days ago, has generated division within the court system, as the application was made to the higher-ranking Supreme Court, causing disquiet among lower court officials. The absence of a clear procedural pathway for accused individuals and their legal representatives has resulted in potential confusion.
In a related development, Bruce Lehrmann, a “high-profile” individual accused of rape in Toowoomba two years ago, can now be named following the denial of a non-publication order in a judicial review. Lehrmann, charged with two counts of rape, has been navigating early committal proceedings since January. The legal proceedings surrounding Lehrmann gained national attention in February 2021, as he was accused of raping another woman, Brittany Higgins, at Parliament House in Canberra in 2019. Recent changes in Queensland law allowed Lehrmann’s naming before trial, in line with other states and territories.
Despite Lehrmann’s legal team’s efforts to secure a non-publication order, arguing potential jury prejudice and harm to mental health, both claims were dismissed by Magistrate Clare Kelly on October 13 2023, a decision upheld by the Supreme Court on Thursday. Media outlets, including Guardian Australia, ABC, Nine, News Corp publications, Network Ten, and Queensland police, opposed the judicial review and non-publication order.
The ongoing legal complexities surrounding Lehrmann, including his defamation case against Network 10, journalist Lisa Wilkinson, and the ABC, underscore the intricate nature of legal proceedings in cases of sexual offenses. The broader implications of these legislative changes guarantees impact on legal procedures and media involvement warrant continued scrutiny and careful consideration.
Our team specialise in criminal law. Our role is to sit down with you and work out the strategy that will get you the best possible result. If you have any questions about this article or any other topic of law, please call our team of experts on 1300 066 669.