Following the e-bike and e-scooter crackdown implemented in July 2026, the Queensland Government has introduced a ‘second phase’ of reforms with even stricter requirements.
Effective from 31 August 2026, the amendments are centered upon riders age, licensing, and further supervision.
Consequently, operating an e-bike on public roads and shared pathways is now restricted to those aged 16 and older who hold an authorised driver’s licence.
Valid interstate or international licences are accepted under the regime, however, those with a suspended or disqualified licence are prohibited from operating any e-mobility device.
The framework provides specific exemptions for:
Medical Conditions and Disabilities
To obtain an exemption, riders must complete Part 1 of the E-Mobility Driver’s Licence Exemption form and have an eligible health practitioner complete Part 2.
This completed form must be carried at all times while riding and presented to police upon request.
Conditions may be imposed by your health practitioner and noted on your exemption form.
Youths Aged 12 to 17 Under Supervision
To comply with the legislation, supervisors must be adults who hold a valid open or provisional driver’s licence, test under the 0.05 Blood Alcohol Concentration limit, and remain drug-free.
Additionally, the supervisor must keep the minor in their direct line of sight and remain close enough to provide continuous verbal guidance.
A single adult can supervise up to two minors simultaneously, provided they can manage both safely.
Penalties for non-compliance include:
Designated Areas
Anyone is permitted to ride an e-mobility device in specified approved areas, including unlicensed individuals under the age of 16.
These areas include:
Our team are experts in criminal law. Our role is to sit down with you and work out the strategy that will get you the best possible result. If you have any questions about this article or any other topic of law, please call our team of experts on 1300 066 669.
Queensland has introduced new laws to crack down on the use of e-bikes amid a reported safety crisis.
The bill comes after Queensland recorded 14 deaths alongside over 6,000 injuries related to and as a consequence of the devices between 2022 and 2025.
The Transport and other Legislation (Managing E-mobility Use and Protecting our Communities Amendment Bill 2026 was introduced to Parliament on 25 March 2026.
The Bill will amend the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995 (Qld) and the Transport Operations (Road Use Management – Road Rules) Regulation 2009 (Qld).
If you or your children are in possession of and operate e-mobility devices, here is what you need to know.
From July 1, 2026, the legislation will require e-bike motors to have a maximum continuous power output of 250 watts.
E-bikes that are de-restricted or throttle-only will be illegal if the motor assists speeds exceeding 25km/h.
The devices must be certified with the European Standard for electrically power-assisted cycles, EN15194, accompanied by a permanently attached compliance label visible on the device, mandatory by 28 February 2027.
The amendments will additionally require riders to be at least 16 years old and hold a valid driver licence of any type or class, with individuals under 16 riding under strict adult supervision.
A maximum speed limit of 25km/h is imposed on designated bike lanes and local roads.
Additionally, riders must slow to a maximum of 12km/h on footpaths when passing pedestrians.
Furthermore, riders must always wear an approved bicycle or motorcycle helmet and maintain their blood alcohol concentration below 0.05.
Under the amendments, holding a mobile phone or resting one on any part of the body while riding is strictly prohibited, including when stationary. The only permitted exception is using a securely mounted, hands-free cradle.
Pursuant to the bill, police powers will extend to include:
Upon noncompliance with the legislation, the court may impose fines ranging from $518 to $6,908, being the maximum penalty, with parents liable for those under 16 fined from 1 July 2026.
Higher penalties will be imposed upon speeding, failure to wear a helmet, careless riding, and illegally carrying passengers.
Our team are experts in criminal law. Our role is to sit down with you and work out the strategy that will get you the best possible result. If you have any questions about this article or any other topic of law, please call our team of experts on 1300 066 669.
Queensland’s “Adult Crime, Adult Time” scheme, contained in section 175A of the Youth Justice Act 1992, allows courts to sentence children for certain serious offences with penalties up to adult maximums. It currently covers 33 major offences, aligning youth detention with adult imprisonment terms and minimum sentences.
When sentencing under section 175A, courts may impose up to 3 years’ probation, or detention up to either 3 years (in the Children’s Court) or the adult maximum (before a Judge). The usual youth‑sentencing principles—such as detention as a last resort—do not apply, and courts must give primary regard to victim impact.
In March 2026, the Expanding Adult Crime, Adult Time and Taking a Strong Stance on Drugs and Anti‑Social Behaviour Amendment Bill 2026 was introduced as the third tranche of reforms. The Bill proposes to:
If enacted, the expanded scheme would apply prospectively to offences committed after commencement. The Government aims to increase coverage to 45 offences.
The Bill also clarifies that applying adult penalties may result in mandatory sentences, noting that a child sentenced to life detention (other than for murder) will be eligible for parole only after 15 years.
A separate measure—the Fighting Antisemitism and Keeping Guns out of the Hands of Terrorists and Criminals Amendment Bill 2026—adds two Weapons Act offences (reckless discharge towards a building/vehicle and possession of firearm blueprints) to the section 175A list, with penalties of up to 10 years’ imprisonment.
Both Bills have passed Parliament but await confirmation of assent and commencement on the legislation register.
If your child has been interviewed, arrested, or charged for any offence potentially captured by “Adult Crime, Adult Time” (including any of the newly proposed offences), obtain legal advice immediately. Our team are experts in criminal law. Our role is to sit down with you and work out the strategy that will get you the best possible result. If you have any questions about this article or any other topic of law, please call our team of experts on 1300 066 669.
The Queensland Government has announced an $8.6 million upgrade of the Rockhampton Courthouse to improve safety and access to justice for domestic and family violence (DFV) matters. It is part of the statewide DFV Courthouse Improvement Program (almost $68m). Confirmed works include a DFV‑dedicated courtroom, two safe rooms for vulnerable witnesses, upgraded entry security and a refurbished registry, due end 2026.
Project scope, budget, timeline and heritage
A budget factsheet – Queensland Budget 2025-26 Regional Delivery Plan: Central Queensland – flagged courthouse upgrades for Rockhampton to improve security and safety for DFV victims, but did not publish a site‑specific budget, scope, or dates.
On 24 February 2026, Attorney‑General Deb Frecklington confirmed a budget of $8.6 million and one dedicated DFV courtroom, two safe rooms, an entry security upgrade, and a refurbished registry.
The wider precinct is heritage‑listed as Rockhampton Court and Administrative Complex on the Queensland Heritage Register (entered 21 October 1992). Queensland guidance notes that most changes to Queensland Heritage Register places are treated as development and generally require approval before work proceeds
| Facility item | Current (public info) | Upgrade (announced) |
| DFV courtroom | Unspecified | 1 dedicated DFV courtroom |
| Safe rooms | Unspecified | 2 dedicated safe rooms |
| Entry security | Unspecified | Upgraded security at entry |
| Registry | Existing registry | Refurbished registry |
| Remote witness room | Listed as available | Unspecified (not stated) |
| Delivery timing | Unspecified | Due end of 2026 (scheduled) |
Current facilities are drawn from Queensland Courts listings; upgrade items are from the February 2026 announcement.
What the upgrade means for court users
The practical focus is safer waiting, better separation and a less intimidating experience at court. The safe rooms are intended as secure, private spaces for vulnerable witnesses; government messaging links them to reducing victims’ exposure to alleged perpetrators outside the courtroom. Entry security will also be strengthened – so allow extra time for screening and arrival logistics.
How this affects domestic and family violence matters
The announcement is grounded in local DFV workload. The government reported that, in the last financial year, the Rockhampton Magistrates Court dealt with 786 applications for domestic violence orders and more than 2,286 charges of contravening a domestic violence order.
Government statements and The Courier-Mail reporting describe the DFV‑dedicated courtroom and safe rooms as support for faster, safer hearings and for reducing backlogs, but no quantified backlog reduction targets have been published for Rockhampton.
The Queensland Law Society has welcomed the package as improving access to justice and safety for DFV victim‑survivors.
In the short term, expect operational impacts – entry screening time, safe-room access protocols, and any registry service changes during refurbishment – will be disrupted.
If you need legal advice in Rockhampton our team are experts in criminal and domestic violence law. Our role is to sit down with you and work out the strategy that will get you the best possible result. If you have any questions about this article or any other topic of law, please call our team of experts on 1300 066 669.
There has recently been a rise in counterfeit cash circulating throughout northeast Queensland, with a number of incidents in Mackay.
Police in Mackay have stated that counterfeit $50 notes have been found at restaurants, shops, and service stations.
Police said some of the recent notes are of “very good quality”, making them difficult to detect.
How to spot fake cash
Some tips from the Reserve Bank of Australia in spotting counterfeit cash include feeling the texture of the note and holding to a light to check for security features. Recent counterfeit bills have been noted as feeling ‘thicker’ than real notes.
Offenders often use counterfeit $50 or $100 notes to make small purchases, aiming to get legitimate currency as change.
The Reserve Bank of Australia provides a counterfeit detection guide located here: https://banknotes.rba.gov.au/counterfeit-detection/counterfeit-detection-guide/
Effects
Passing off counterfeit currency can have a negative impact on communities where it takes place.
Business are not the only entity effected; customers may be at risk of receiving counterfeit currency as change when shopping at an effected business.
Tan Minh Phan, a Queensland owner of a fish and chip shop, stated to Yahoo Finance that, “You lost the money, you lost the food and you don’t know how much change you’ve given to them”, showcasing the significant effect that fake notes can have on business owners.
Criminal Liability for Using Counterfeit Currency
People who possess or produce counterfeit can face a number of charges:
Our team are experts in criminal law. Our role is to sit down with you and work out the strategy that will get you the best possible result. If you have any questions about this article or any other topic of law, please call our team of experts on 1300 066 669.
Queensland recently introduced new legislation targeting hate speech and extremist expressions, representing a significant change in the state’s criminal law framework. The laws were introduced through the Fighting Antisemitism and Keeping Guns Out of the Hands of Terrorists and Criminals Amendment Bill 2026, which passed Parliament on 5 March 2026 and came into effect shortly afterwards.
What the New Laws Criminalise
The legislation strengthens criminal penalties for certain forms of speech or expression that are considered threatening, intimidating, or likely to promote hatred.
The reforms allow authorities to treat some phrases and symbols as prohibited expressions if used in circumstances that could cause menace, harassment, or offence.
Practically, this means that certain (obvious) slogans, gestures, or statements may now give rise to criminal liability depending on how they are used and the surrounding circumstances.
Early Enforcement of the Laws
The laws attracted national attention almost immediately after coming into force. Within days, police arrested protesters in Brisbane who allegedly used slogans that had been classified as prohibited under the new legislation.
One individual was charged for allegedly chanting a banned phrase during a protest outside Queensland Parliament, while another protester received a formal police caution after displaying the same slogan on clothing.
These arrests have sparked debate among legal experts and civil liberties groups about whether the laws could potentially restrict legitimate political expression.
Potential Legal Challenges
Some lawyers and civil liberties organisations have suggested the laws may face legal challenges. Critics argue the legislation could conflict with the implied constitutional freedom of political communication recognised by the High Court.
Supporters of the reforms, however, argue the laws are necessary to prevent speech that may incite violence or hatred toward vulnerable communities.
Looking Ahead – Cautiously
For individuals participating in public demonstrations or engaging in political activism, understanding the boundaries of the new hate speech laws will be increasingly important.
Our team are experts in criminal and traffic law. Our role is to sit down with you and work out the strategy that will get you the best possible result. If you have any questions about this article or any other topic of law, please call our team of experts on 1300 066 669.
Queensland’s “Adult Crime, Adult Time” policy has been expanded again, significantly increasing the number of offences for which young offenders can receive adult-level penalties.
Recent amendments have expanded the scheme to include 45 offences, representing a substantial increase in the number of crimes covered by the policy.
How it Works
Historically, youth offenders in Queensland were subject to a separate sentencing framework that prioritised rehabilitation. Courts were generally required to treat detention as a last resort.
The scheme modifies this approach by allowing courts to impose adult sentencing standards for specific serious offences committed by children aged 10 to 17.
Offences Covered by the Expansion
The list of offences included in the scheme has grown steadily since the policy was first introduced.
The latest expansion added 12 new offences, bringing the total number of offences covered by the scheme to 45:
Further Additions
Given the political focus on youth crime in Queensland, further reforms to youth justice laws remain possible.
As new cases begin to emerge under the expanded scheme, courts will play a key role in shaping how these laws are applied in practice.
Our team are experts in criminal and traffic law. Our role is to sit down with you and work out the strategy that will get you the best possible result. If you have any questions about this article or any other topic of law, please call our team of experts on 1300 066 669.
Drink driving remains one of the most common criminal offences dealt with in Queensland courts. The offence is regulated primarily under the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995 (Qld) and includes several categories depending on the driver’s blood alcohol concentration (BAC).
Queensland operates a graduated penalty system, meaning mandatory consequences increase depending on the level of intoxication and whether the offender has prior convictions.
For many drivers, a drink driving charge is their first interaction with the criminal justice system, which can make the court process unfamiliar and stressful.
Categories of Drink Driving Charges
Low Range Offence
A BAC between 0.05 and 0.099 is considered a low range offence. While penalties are typically lower than other categories, drivers still face a mandatory licence disqualification and fine (for a first offence).
Mid-Range Offence
A BAC between 0.10 and 0.149 falls into the mid-range category. Penalties increase significantly and include longer disqualification periods, higher fines, and other appropriate penalties.
High Range Offence
A BAC of 0.15 or above is considered a high range offence and is treated very seriously by the courts. Drivers may face:
High range offences often attract more detailed sentencing submissions, particularly if aggravating factors are present (such as a crash).
Additional Offences
Queensland law also criminalises related conduct such as:
Work Licences and Restricted Licences
In some circumstances, a person charged with drink driving may be eligible to apply for a restricted licence, commonly referred to as a work licence.
To obtain a work licence, the applicant must satisfy strict criteria, including demonstrating that losing their licence would cause extreme hardship and that they are otherwise a fit and proper person to hold a licence – this usually requires a well crafted affidavit. Courts carefully assess these applications and supporting material.
The Importance of Early Legal Advice
While drink driving charges may appear straightforward, the consequences can be significant. A conviction may affect employment, insurance and travel opportunities (such as a visa).
Obtaining legal advice early can help individuals understand their options, prepare appropriate material for court and ensure that their matter is presented effectively.
Our team are experts in criminal and traffic law. Our role is to sit down with you and work out the strategy that will get you the best possible result. If you have any questions about this article or any other topic of law, please call our team of experts on 1300 066 669.
Digital evidence has become one of the most important components of modern criminal investigations. With smartphones, social media and connected devices embedded in daily life, electronic data frequently plays a central role in criminal prosecutions.
Police now routinely examine digital material to reconstruct timelines, establish communication between individuals and identify patterns of behaviour.
Common Types of Digital Evidence
Digital evidence may come from a variety of sources, including:
In many cases, these records can provide critical insight into the events surrounding an alleged offence.
Digital Evidence in Domestic Violence Matters
Domestic violence cases often rely heavily on electronic communications. Investigators may analyse months or years of text messages, emails and social media interactions to determine whether a pattern of behaviour exists.
Location data and call records may also be used to establish whether individuals were present at particular locations.
The Future of Digital Evidence
As technology continues to evolve, digital evidence will play an even greater role in criminal investigations. Lawyers must increasingly understand how electronic data is collected, analysed and presented in court.
Our team are experts in criminal law. Our role is to sit down with you and work out the strategy that will get you the best possible result. If you have any questions about this article or any other topic of law, please call our team of experts on 1300 066 669.
Queensland criminal law underwent a major reform in 2025 with the introduction of a standalone offence of coercive control. The offence commenced on 26 May 2025 and represents a significant shift in how domestic and family violence is treated under criminal law.
Specifically, it sits under Section 344C of the Criminal Code 1899.
What is Coercive Control
Traditionally, criminal charges in domestic violence matters focused on specific acts, such as assault, stalking or property damage.
Coercive control refers to behaviour that seeks to dominate, isolate, or manipulate another person in an intimate or family relationship. Importantly, the offence does not require proof of a single violent act. Instead, the prosecution must establish that the accused engaged in a course of conduct intended to control or coerce another person:
These behaviours may individually appear minor but can become criminal when they form part of a broader pattern designed to control another person.
Penalties
The offence carries a maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment. Courts will consider a range of factors when assessing whether the legal threshold is met, including the duration of the conduct, the nature of the relationship, and the impact on the alleged victim.
Evidence may include:
Because coercive control involves a pattern of behaviour over time, cases may rely on evidence spanning months or even years.
Practical Implications for Criminal Cases
For individuals under investigation, early legal advice is particularly important. These matters often involve extensive digital evidence and detailed examination of relationship history.
Criminal defence lawyers must carefully analyse whether the alleged conduct meets the statutory definition and whether the prosecution can establish a course of conduct beyond reasonable doubt.
Our team are experts in criminal law. Our role is to sit down with you and work out the strategy that will get you the best possible result. If you have any questions about this article or any other topic of law, please call our team of experts on 1300 066 669.